This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brueckner, J. K. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Urban Sprawl: Diagnosis and Remedies

Department of Economics and Institute of Government and Public Affairs, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, jbrueckn{at}uiuc.edu

This article argues that urban spatial expansion results mainly from three powerful forces: a growing population, rising incomes, and falling commuting costs. Urban growth occurring purely in response to these fundamental forces cannot be faulted as socially undesirable, but three market failures may distort their operation, upsetting the allocation of land between agricultural and urban uses and justifying criticism of urban sprawl. These are the failure to account for the benefits of open space, excessive commuting because of a failure to account for the social costs of congestion, and failure to make new development pay for the infrastructure costs it generates. Precise remedies for these market failures are two types of development taxes and congestion tolls levied on commuters. Each of these remedies leads to a reduction in the spatial size of the city.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. I. Carruthers and G. F. Ulfarsson Does `Smart Growth' Matter to Public Finance? Urban Stud, August 1, 2008; 45(9): 1791 - 1823. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. A. Rodriguez, F. Targa, and S. A. Aytur Transport Implications of Urban Containment Policies: A Study of the Largest Twenty-five US Metropolitan Areas Urban Stud, September 1, 2006; 43(10): 1879 - 1897. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. C. Cheshire Resurgent Cities, Urban Myths and Policy Hubris: What We Need to Know Urban Stud, July 1, 2006; 43(8): 1231 - 1246. [PDF]

				B. A. Mikelbank Be Careful what You wish for: The House Price Impact of Investments in Transportation Infrastructure Urban Affairs Review, September 1, 2005; 41(1): 20 - 46. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. Audirac Information Technology and Urban Form: Challenges to Smart Growth International Regional Science Review, April 1, 2005; 28(2): 119 - 145. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Byun and A. X. Esparza A Revisionist Model of Suburbanization and Sprawl: The Role of Political Fragmentation, Growth Control, and Spillovers Journal of Planning Education and Research, March 1, 2005; 24(3): 252 - 264. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Levine, A. Inam, and G.-W. Torng A Choice-Based Rationale for Land Use and Transportation Alternatives: Evidence from Boston and Atlanta Journal of Planning Education and Research, March 1, 2005; 24(3): 317 - 330. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. J. Stewart, Z.-Y. Yin, S. M. Bullard, and J. T. MacLachlan Assessing the Spatial Structure of Urban and Population Growth in the Greater Cairo Area, Egypt: A GIS and Imagery Analysis Approach Urban Stud, January 1, 2004; 41(1): 95 - 116. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. I. Carruthers The Impacts of State Growth Management Programmes: A Comparative Analysis Urban Stud, October 1, 2002; 39(11): 1959 - 1982. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. S. Henry, B. Schmitt, and V. Piguet Spatial Econometric Models for Simultaneous Systems: Application to Rural Community Growth in France International Regional Science Review, April 1, 2001; 24(2): 171 - 193. [Abstract] [PDF]