|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Estimates of Time to Economic Convergence: An Analysis of Regions of the European Union
Bernard Fingleton
Department of Land Economy, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK, bf100{at}cam.ac.uk
According to the simplest neoclassical theory, closer integration will ultimately eliminate the current differences in per capita incomes between European Union (EU) regions. Models based on the Keynesian tradition and endogenous growth theory suggest different outcomes. This article looks at the evidence for convergence along neoclassical lines and also from a point of view that accepts the critique of neoclassical theory. Estimates are made of the time it will take for two different forms of equilibrium to be realized. From a neoclassical perspective, there is only weak evidence that EU regions are converging in terms of their output per capita, requiring more than two centuries for approximate convergence to be achieved. From a non-neoclassical perspective, stochastic equilibrium will require more than three centuries, although the hypothesis that the regions have already achieved stochastic equilibrium cannot be dismissed.
International Regional Science Review, Vol. 22, No. 1,
5-34 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/016001769902200102

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Ezcurra, P. Pascual, and M. Rapun
Spatial Inequality in Productivity in the European Union: Sectoral and Regional Factors
International Regional Science Review,
October 1, 2007;
30(4):
384 - 407.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Ezcurra and M. Rapun
Regional Disparities and National Development Revisited: The Case of Western Europe
European Urban and Regional Studies,
October 1, 2006;
13(4):
355 - 369.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Ertur, J. Le Gallo, and C. Baumont
The European Regional Convergence Process, 1980-1995: Do Spatial Regimes and Spatial Dependence Matter?
International Regional Science Review,
January 1, 2006;
29(1):
3 - 34.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. W. Hammond and E. Thompson
Convergence and Mobility: Personal Income Trends in U.S. Metropolitan and Nonmetropolitan Regions
International Regional Science Review,
January 1, 2006;
29(1):
35 - 63.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Carrington
Regional Convergence in the European Union: A Stochastic Dominance Approach
International Regional Science Review,
January 1, 2006;
29(1):
64 - 80.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Ezcurra, C. Gil, P. Pascual, and M. Rapun
Inequality, Polarisation and Regional Mobility in the European Union
Urban Stud,
June 1, 2005;
42(7):
1057 - 1076.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Benito and R. Ezcurra
Spatial Disparities in Productivity and Industry Mix: The Case of the European Regions
European Urban and Regional Studies,
April 1, 2005;
12(2):
177 - 194.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Aroca, M. Bosch, and W. F. Maloney
Spatial Dimensions of Trade Liberalization and Economic Convergence: Mexico 1985-2002
World Bank Econ. Rev.,
January 1, 2005;
19(3):
345 - 378.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Le Gallo
Space-Time Analysis of GDP Disparities among European Regions: A Markov Chains Approach
International Regional Science Review,
April 1, 2004;
27(2):
138 - 163.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. G. M. Florax and A. J. Van der Vlist
Spatial Econometric Data Analysis: Moving Beyond Traditional Models
International Regional Science Review,
July 1, 2003;
26(3):
223 - 243.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Bickenbach and E. Bode
Evaluating the Markov Property in Studies of Economic Convergence
International Regional Science Review,
July 1, 2003;
26(3):
363 - 392.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. B. Mossi, P. Aroca, I. J. FernaNDEZ, and C. R. Azzoni
Growth Dynamics and Space in Brazil
International Regional Science Review,
July 1, 2003;
26(3):
393 - 418.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Fingleton
Externalities, Economic Geography, And Spatial Econometrics: Conceptual And Modeling Developments
International Regional Science Review,
April 1, 2003;
26(2):
197 - 207.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. F. Goodchild, L. Anselin, R. P. Appelbaum, and B. H. Harthorn
Toward Spatially Integrated Social Science
International Regional Science Review,
April 1, 2000;
23(2):
139 - 159.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|