This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0160017609336079v1 32/3/264    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Glaeser, E. L. Articles by Redlick, C. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Social Capital and Urban Growth

Littauer Center, eglaeser{at}harvard.edu

Charles Redlick

Harvard University, charles.redlick{at}post.harvard.edu

Social capital is often place-specific while schooling is portable, so the prospect of migration may reduce the returns to social capital and increase the returns to schooling. If social capital matters for urban success, it is possible that an area can get caught in a bad equilibrium where the prospect of out-migration reduces social capital investment and a lack of social capital investment makes out-migration more appealing. We present a simple model of that process and then test its implications. We find little evidence to suggest that social capital is correlated with either area growth or rates of out-migration. We do, however, find significant differences in the returns to human capital across space, and a significant pattern of skilled people disproportionately leaving declining areas. For people in declining areas, the prospect of out-migration may increase the returns to investment in human capital, but it does not seem to impact investment in social capital.

This version was published on July 1, 2009

International Regional Science Review, Vol. 32, No. 3, 264-299 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0160017609336079


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?