| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Can Geographically Weighted Regressions Improve Regional Analysis and Policy Making?Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Saskatchewan, Canada, kamar.ali{at}usask.ca
Swank Chair in Rural-Urban Policy, Professor, AED Economics, Ohio State University, Columbus, Partridge.27{at}osu.edu
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Saskatchewan, Canada, rose.olfert{at}usask.ca Policy design in a regional context requires explicit recognition of spatial heterogeneity in community characteristics as well as in the heterogeneity of how these characteristics impact the target variables. By providing only a "global" measure for the entire space, standard approaches such as ordinary least squares or (most) spatial econometric models tend to compromise spatial heterogeneity in favor of average estimates and efficiency. More assessment is needed of whether the gains of simplicity and statistical efficiency offset the losses from ignoring spatial heterogeneity. Using data for about 1,900 rural Canadian communities as a backdrop, the authors address this issue using a geographically weighted regression approach. The authors find that for about two-thirds of the variables, standard approaches would have significantly understated the spatial differences in the impact of selected variables. Standard analysis would not have uncovered this information, suggesting that subsequent policy inferences would be poorly suited to many local settings.
Key Words: geographically weighted regression • spatial regression • rural development • rural policy making
International Regional Science Review, Vol. 30, No. 3,
300-329 (2007) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||
 |
|
|
 |
|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
