International Regional Science Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gottlieb, P. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
International Regional Science Review, Vol. 29, No. 2, 135-158 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0160017606286271

"Running Down the Up Escalator": A Revisionist Perspective on Decentralization and Deconcentration in the United States, 1970-2000

Paul D. Gottlieb

Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey gottlieb{at}aesop.rutgers.edu

This article proposes that decentralization and deconcentration in the United States be measured by tracking the proportion of people or jobs in fixed categories of places across census years, using metropolitan areas designated in each year rather than the fixed-year standard employed in studies that measure growth or migration rates. Measured this way, there was continuous centralization to metropolitan areas from 1970 to 2000 as well as a marked preference for very large metropolitan areas after 1980. This period of rapid economic transformation has generated theoretical explanationsnot only of decentralization,but also of recentralization(e.g., in the 1980s). Most of these explanations rely on fundamental shifts in society’s preferences for metropolitan or nonmetropolitan settings. The data suggest that decentralizing behavior, like the "nonmetro turnaround" of the 1970s, can instead be explained as an attempt to maintain the status quo. The essence of this behavior is captured in the phrase "running down the up escalator." A related argument from the literature on metropolitan deconcentration is also analyzed.

Key Words: decentralization • deconcentration • agglomeration • migration • amenities • urban systems


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?