This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Weber, B. Articles by Fisher, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A Critical Review of Rural Poverty Literature: Is There Truly a Rural Effect?

Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Oregon State University; RUPRI Rural Poverty Research Center, Corvallisbruce.weber{at}oregonstate.edu

Leif Jensen

Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology and the Population Research Institute, Pennsylvania State University, University Park ljensen{at}psu.edu

Kathleen Miller

Rural Policy Research Institute, Truman School of Public Affairs, University of Missouri–Columbia millerkk{at}missouri.edu

Jane Mosley

Truman School of Public Affairs, University of Missouri–Columbia; RUPRI Rural Poverty Research Center, Columbia, MO mosleyj{at}missouri.edu

Monica Fisher

Truman School of Public Affairs, University of Missouri–Columbia; RUPRI Rural Poverty Research Center, Corvallis, OR monica.fisher{at}oregonstate.edu

Poverty rates are highest in the most urban and most rural areas of the United States and are higher in nonmetropolitan than metropolitan areas. Yet perhaps because only one-fifth of the nation's 35 million poor people live in nonmetro areas, rural poverty has received less attention than urban poverty from both policy makers and researchers. The authors provide a critical review of literature that examines the factors affecting poverty in rural areas. The authors focus on studies that explore whether there is a rural effect, that is, whether there is something about rural places above and beyond demographic characteristics and local economic context that makes poverty more likely in those places. The authors identify methodological concerns (such as endogenous membership and omitted variables) that may limit the validity of conclusions from existing studies that there is a rural effect. The authors conclude with suggestions for research that would address these concerns and explore the processes and institutions in urban and rural areas that determine poverty, outcomes, and policy impacts.

Key Words: rural poverty • place effects • neighborhood effects • research methodology

International Regional Science Review, Vol. 28, No. 4, 381-414 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0160017605278996


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. M. Isserman, E. Feser, and D. E. Warren Why Some Rural Places Prosper and Others Do Not International Regional Science Review, July 1, 2009; 32(3): 300 - 342. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. J. Peters Typology of American Poverty International Regional Science Review, January 1, 2009; 32(1): 19 - 39. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Nizalov and A. A. Schmid Poverty in Michigan Small Communities: Demand Versus Supply of Labor International Regional Science Review, July 1, 2008; 31(3): 275 - 303. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. W. Evans, L. Boxhill, and M. Pinkava Poverty and maternal responsiveness: The role of maternal stress and social resources International Journal of Behavioral Development, May 1, 2008; 32(3): 232 - 237. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. M. Lobao, G. Hooks, and A. R. Tickamyer Poverty and inequality across space: sociological reflections on the missing-middle subnational scale Cambridge J Regions Econ Soc, April 1, 2008; 1(1): 89 - 113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. T. Lichter, D. Parisi, M. C. Taquino, and B. Beaulieu Race and the micro-scale spatial concentration of poverty Cambridge J Regions Econ Soc, April 1, 2008; 1(1): 51 - 67. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. D. Partridge and D. S. Rickman Place-based policy and rural poverty: insights from the urban spatial mismatch literature Cambridge J Regions Econ Soc, April 1, 2008; 1(1): 131 - 156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. D. Partridge and D. S. Rickman High-Poverty Nonmetropolitan Counties in America: Can Economic Development Help? International Regional Science Review, October 1, 2005; 28(4): 415 - 440. [Abstract] [PDF]