International Regional Science Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brain, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
International Regional Science Review, Vol. 28, No. 2, 217-238 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0160017605275161

From Good Neighborhoods to Sustainable Cities: Social Science and the Social Agenda of the New Urbanism

David Brain

Division of Social Sciences, New College of Florida, Sarasota, FL, brain{at}ncf.edu

Despite of the growing influence of the new urbanism, social science has contributed relatively little to our understanding of the movement’s significance. Research has often focused on testing hypotheses derived directly from new urbanist claims, rather than posing questions grounded in sociological theory and empirical study of actual transformations of planning, design, and development practice. This article proposes an understanding of the sociology implicit in the new urbanism as it has organized the reform of professional practice in terms of two distinct ideals: community, with its rhetoric of solidarity based on common feeling, and urbanism, with echoes of an Arendtian conception of the public realm. Although new urbanists have not recognized important social and political implications of their project, their efforts to transform the way we build neighborhoods and cities suggest important lessons for a research agenda and a sociology of place more usefully connected to place-making practice.

Key Words: new urbanism • community • place • sociological aspects


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban StudHome page
L. du Toit, E. Cerin, E. Leslie, and N. Owen
Does Walking in the Neighbourhood Enhance Local Sociability?
Urban Stud, August 1, 2007; 44(9): 1677 - 1695.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning LiteratureHome page
E. Talen
Design That Enables Diversity: The Complications of a Planning Ideal
Journal of Planning Literature, February 1, 2006; 20(3): 233 - 249.
[Abstract] [PDF]