International Regional Science Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Handy, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
International Regional Science Review, Vol. 28, No. 2, 146-167 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0160017604273626

Smart Growth and the Transportation-Land Use Connection: What Does the Research Tell Us?

Susan Handy

Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis, slhandy{at}ucdavis.edu

The connection between transportation and land use lies at the center of efforts in the United States to combat sprawl through smart growth strategies. Proponents of smart growth commonly make several specific propositions about the relationships between transportation and land use: (1) building more highways will contribute to more sprawl, (2) building more highways will lead to more driving, (3) investing in light rail transit systems will increase densities, and (4) adopting new urbanism design strategies will reduce automobile use. This article explores how well the available evidence supports these four propositions and provides an overview of the theory, research efforts, and current debates associated with each of these propositions. This overview shows that the four propositions have not yet been fully resolved: researchers have made more progress on some of these propositions than others, but even in the best cases, our ability to predict the impact of smart growth policies remains limited.

Key Words: transportation • growth management • smart growth • travel behavior • transit-oriented development


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
M.-J. Jun
Are Portland's Smart Growth Policies Related to Reduced Automobile Dependence?
Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 1, 2008; 28(1): 100 - 107.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
P. Filion and K. McSpurren
Smart Growth and Development Reality: The Difficult Co-ordination of Land Use and Transport Objectives
Urban Stud, March 1, 2007; 44(3): 501 - 523.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Regional Science ReviewHome page
L. D. Frank and P. Engelke
Multiple Impacts of the Built Environment on Public Health: Walkable Places and the Exposure to Air Pollution
International Regional Science Review, April 1, 2005; 28(2): 193 - 216.
[Abstract] [PDF]